[oe] [RFC] Ship dbus config and dbus service activation files

[Mike (mwester)]

Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> We can compile it completely without dbus support in a seperate recipe, if 
> that's what you want -- but given the increasing ubiquity of dbus, that 
> doesn't make much sense.

Which raises a point -- there are still devices out there that don't
want the X11 libraries (due to flash space limitations) -- perhaps it is
_dbus_ that needs splitting into two separate recipes, one with X and
one without?

I think this would mean that everything would change to depend on
"virtual/dbus", right?  -- and that would be a fairly disruptive change,
hence my comments here to see if anyone has strong protests or better ideas.

Mike (mwester)