[oe] [oe-commits] org.oe.dev devimage 0.1: Up a usb0 on load, now that we're modular.

[pHilipp Zabel]

On Feb 16, 2008 5:54 PM, Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:30:35 +0100
> Marcin Juszkiewicz <openembedded at haerwu.biz> wrote:
>
> > Dnia Saturday, 16 of February 2008, pfalcon commit napisał:
> > > devimage 0.1: Up a usb0 on load, now that we're modular.
> >
> > > +modprobe g_ether
> > > +ifconfig usb0 192.168.2.202
> >
> > I am curious when someone will push usb0 to 192.168.3.202... Please
> > use netbase standard: 192.168.0.202 in your recipe.
>
> 192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.0/24 are not good choices as those are
> oftentimes refer to existing networks (yes, those vendors love to use
> "standard" values too). 2 is of course not good either, something more
> random should be used. Which exactly should be subject of RFC. (And
> no, this is not related to netbase which offers some value for user to
> edit. This one is not supposed to be editable by end user.)

I won't argue for or against a certain value, because none of them is
a better choice than any other.
(I use subnets 192.168.x.0/24 for x in 1,2,3,4,10,178 for other
purposes already, 0 is free for usb).
But please make this and the netbase one have the same value.

regards
Philipp