[oe] RFC: kernel.bbclass and collie changes
Phil Blundell
pb at reciva.com
Sat Jul 26 09:38:02 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 01:56 +0200, Thomas Kunze wrote:
> +/dev/mmcblk0p1 b 6600 0 6 179 1 - - -
Is that "6600" really correct?
It does also seem bit odd having an mmc device in the "minimal" device
table. I can understand why you need it on collie but I am not sure it
is all that desirable for device-table-minimal.txt to become the union
of the devices that everybody needs on their favourite platform for
booting purposes. Since this is truly a machine specific thing I would
be inclined to use a separate file, or a collie-specific catenation onto
the installed copy.
p.
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list