[oe] RFC: kernel.bbclass and collie changes

Phil Blundell pb at reciva.com
Sat Jul 26 09:38:02 UTC 2008


On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 01:56 +0200, Thomas Kunze wrote:
> +/dev/mmcblk0p1	b	6600	0	6	179	1	-	-	-

Is that "6600" really correct?

It does also seem bit odd having an mmc device in the "minimal" device
table.  I can understand why you need it on collie but I am not sure it
is all that desirable for device-table-minimal.txt to become the union
of the devices that everybody needs on their favourite platform for
booting purposes.  Since this is truly a machine specific thing I would
be inclined to use a separate file, or a collie-specific catenation onto
the installed copy.

p.






More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list