[oe] RFC: kernel.bbclass and collie changes

[Thomas Kunze]

Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 01:56 +0200, Thomas Kunze wrote:
>   
>> +/dev/mmcblk0p1	b	6600	0	6	179	1	-	-	-
>>     
>
> Is that "6600" really correct?
>   
Of course not. Just a typo.
> It does also seem bit odd having an mmc device in the "minimal" device
> table.  I can understand why you need it on collie but I am not sure it
> is all that desirable for device-table-minimal.txt to become the union
> of the devices that everybody needs on their favourite platform for
> booting purposes.  Since this is truly a machine specific thing I would
> be inclined to use a separate file, or a collie-specific catenation onto
> the installed copy.
>   
I see your point. But OTOH we have 20 hda*, 9 serial consoles and 16 mtd
nodes in there. So its hardly minimal. In my opinion it doesn't hurt to add
a further node.