[oe] ipkg/opkg offical response
Tom Rini
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Mar 27 23:09:28 UTC 2008
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:57:37PM +0100, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
> > Richard Purdie schreef:
> >
> > | * Adding do_deploy to packaged-staging's knowledge. This is best done
> > | with the patch for kernel.bbclass that thesing was been working on. I've
> > | made some suggestions for tweaks (looking at the version already in
> > | poky) and suggested he commits it after that.
> >
> > That patch broke uImage kernels *real bad*, I just pushed a fix for it.
>
> I have pushed an additional fix for the changes to kernel.bbclass.
> The DEPENDS added by kernel.bbclass (u-boot-mkimage-native) conflicted
> with the one added by linux.inc (u-boot-mkimage-openmoko-native).
>
> I changed the DEPENDS to u-boot-mkimage-openmoko-native in
> kernel.bbclass and removed the DEPENDS from linux.inc. The assumption
> here is that u-boot-mkimage-openmoko-native is a strict superset of
> u-boot-mkimage-native.
I'll ask the silly qustion. Given that mkimage hasn't changed in I
don't know how long, why are both providing it? Just to save on sources
downloaded? Did OM really change mkimage?
--
Tom Rini
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list