[oe] RFC: reverse the name change for org.oe.stable

[Rod Whitby]

Koen Kooi wrote:
> Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> 
>> That reminds me, we should lock-down (and include) the corresponding
>> bitbake version in the stable tree as well.
> 
> I proposed that a while ago, but it got NAKed, time to propose it again? 
> I see no reason why we shouldn't have a known working bitbake copy 
> inside the stable tree

+1 from me - when nslu2-linux creates a binary release source tarball we 
always include bitbake in the tarball.

-- Rod