[oe] preferred-provider at the image level a.k.a why is all this fso stuff in my non-fso image

[Phil Blundell]

On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 21:09 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> I'd rather have it only Conflict:, but that places extra burden on the 
> fso people.

I must admit to being a bit baffled as to the effect that you (and/or
the fso people) are trying to produce.  Can you explain a bit more of
the background to this arrangement of packages?

p.