[oe] preferred-provider at the image level a.k.a why is all this fso stuff in my non-fso image

[Koen Kooi]

On 26-11-08 22:27, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 21:09 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> I'd rather have it only Conflict:, but that places extra burden on the
>> fso people.
>
> I must admit to being a bit baffled as to the effect that you (and/or
> the fso people) are trying to produce.  Can you explain a bit more of
> the background to this arrangement of packages?

I'm trying to clean up the 'mess' caused by the fso-packages, you'd have 
to ask Mickey what he actually wanted to achieve with the 
conflicts/replaces/provides dance.

regards,

Koen