[oe] reverting some csets that kill package upgrade paths

[Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)]

On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:56:17 +0200 Marcin Juszkiewicz
<marcin at juszkiewicz.com.pl> said:

> Dnia sobota, 25 kwietnia 2009 o 23:37:14 Koen Kooi napisał(a):
> > On 25-04-09 23:18, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> 
> > >> So suddenly the library packages (or plugin packages, but no
> > >> difference in this case) have a new name, but don't set RPROVIDES
> > >> or RREPLACES to the old packages containing *the same files*.
> 
> > > Provide a patch which will add such ones?
> 
> > Well, I verified that e-wm started in beagleboard-demo-image in a
> > build from scratch and in an upgraded images 2 days ago, so any
> > problems those 3 patches were supposed to fix weren't that critical.
> > *After* those 3 patches I have a broken build and broken upgrade
> > paths, while *before* things were working for me.
> 
> > I actually tested the changes I made for build from scratch as well
> > as upgrading an image. While upgrading I actually noticed the ecore
> > bug which was present. I could have revert the SRCREV bump, but I
> > went ahead and fixed it. 
> 
> But origin/org.openembedded.dev is not koen/org.openembedded.dev - you 
> are *not the only user* of that branch (asterisks added because it looks 
> like you like them). And we have a weekend now - you should wait and 
> check what would other say about those 3 changsets. As I said: 
> origin/org.openembedded.dev is not your sandbox - we also like to play 
> there.

true - not the onyl user.. but if it breaks for him.. that is a break - and
something to fix. if changes broke something - fix the changes or revert. i
guess this thread is about screaming "revert!" in  hopes that the changes will
get fixed asap before a revert actually happens (and you start some
commit/revert war) :)

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    raster at rasterman.com