[oe] reverting some csets that kill package upgrade paths

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 04:40:42PM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:03:18PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>>> Upgrade paths are the foundation of package management, breaking them 
>>> is  stabbing people using your binaries in the eye. Do you want to 
>>> tell the  companies evaluating OE using .dev that they can't use the 
>>> feature  anymore that drew them to OE, namely package management?
>>
>> Red Herring.  No commerical device is going to point to some random feed
>> and just hope things work out fine.  No, they're going to point at their
>> supported feeds with updates they've tested and fixed any bugs that they
>> happened to have found (and pushed back because they're Good Guys).
>
> I disagree. Angstrom is usable and depends on stable having sane upgrade  
> paths as a community supported distro.

The key being stable.  If I wasn't clear, a feed based on .dev is most
certainly random.  A feed for a specific release would hopefully not be
based on .dev.  A company working with Angstrom is feasible and would be
what I said :)

-- 
Tom Rini