[oe] [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : Revert "ecore: catch up with the new SONAMEs; move to autosplitting"

[Cliff Brake]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:

> If we are to have a core team as the governing body for OE then I would
> like to see it taking a more active role in overseeing the project (in
> particular, to guide policies for technical issues and not merely focus
> on administrivia such as the formatting of commit messages or
> Signed-off-by lines), and for this to be done in a more transparent way.
> If the current members of the core team are, for whatever reason, not
> willing or able to discharge those duties then (much as I hesitate to
> call for this) perhaps it's time to hold elections and appoint new
> members in their place.

One possible path is to:

1) figure out how to get members added to the eV that is already in place.
2) hold elections for a board

In the absence of an active benevolent dictator, I see regular
elections as the only path forward.

We also need to stop waiting on the next OSS event to take the next
step.  We can host conf calls, etc -- whatever it takes.  Documents
can be scanned/emailed -- we don't have to be in person to sign.  KDE
seems to have a process for adding eV members.

Cliff

-- 
=======================
Cliff Brake
http://bec-systems.com