[oe] Mistakenly pushed changes without review, specially 6633c4c95a

Otavio Salvador otavio at ossystems.com.br
Sat Jul 11 20:11:24 UTC 2009


Hello Michael,

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Michael Smith<msmith at cbnco.com> wrote:
> It looked good to me, but bitbake bails with:

Yes, you weren't the only one and it has already been reverted in dev.
I'd like to fix it now to get it properly pushed.

[...]
> Also -- I've seen some references to MACHINE_CLASS. I'm wondering if it was
> intended to solve a similar problem.

Similar, yes.

MACHINE_CLASS is different since it is not supported by all distros
and it has been being used for reuse a class of settings not whole
configuration like kernel defconfig, etc...

Besides that the MACHINE_FALLBACK is going to be used as MACHINE in
case MACHINE is not found. That makes quite easy to reuse kernel and
other settings. For example if you have a machine that uses geodelx
processor you might reuse the defconfig for it (quite useful specially
at began of a new board development).

> Here's the traceback for the bailout.

Please tell me more about your environment:

 - distro
 - machine

TIA,

-- 
Otavio Salvador                  O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854         http://projetos.ossystems.com.br




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list