[oe] Mistakenly pushed changes without review, specially 6633c4c95a
Otavio Salvador
otavio at ossystems.com.br
Sat Jul 11 20:11:24 UTC 2009
Hello Michael,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Michael Smith<msmith at cbnco.com> wrote:
> It looked good to me, but bitbake bails with:
Yes, you weren't the only one and it has already been reverted in dev.
I'd like to fix it now to get it properly pushed.
[...]
> Also -- I've seen some references to MACHINE_CLASS. I'm wondering if it was
> intended to solve a similar problem.
Similar, yes.
MACHINE_CLASS is different since it is not supported by all distros
and it has been being used for reuse a class of settings not whole
configuration like kernel defconfig, etc...
Besides that the MACHINE_FALLBACK is going to be used as MACHINE in
case MACHINE is not found. That makes quite easy to reuse kernel and
other settings. For example if you have a machine that uses geodelx
processor you might reuse the defconfig for it (quite useful specially
at began of a new board development).
> Here's the traceback for the bailout.
Please tell me more about your environment:
- distro
- machine
TIA,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list