[oe] [PATCH 2/2] udev: moved udevadm to the main udev package

[Phil Blundell]

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:57 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:59 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> I belive that the right way to fix it is add a binary package only for
> >> >> udevadm
> >> >
> >> > That's pretty much what udev-utils is: it doesn't contain any binaries
> >> > apart from udevadm.
> >>
> >> In this case the binary package is wrong.
> >
> > Why so?
> 
> I think udev-udevadm is more sound for me.

Ah, you mean the package name?  Yes, udev-udevadm would probably be
better if we were doing this again from scratch, but renaming an
existing package is a fairly disruptive thing to do and I don't think
the existing one is wrong enough to make it worthwhile.

> Or maybe hal ought to depends on udev-(utils|udevadm) instead ;-)

It already does.  See hal_0.5.9.1.bb for example, which has:

RDEPENDS_${PN} += "udev-utils hal-info"

p.