[oe] [PATCH 2/2] udev: moved udevadm to the main udev package

[Otavio Salvador]

Hello,

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:57 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:59 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> >> I belive that the right way to fix it is add a binary package only for
>> >> >> udevadm
>> >> >
>> >> > That's pretty much what udev-utils is: it doesn't contain any binaries
>> >> > apart from udevadm.
>> >>
>> >> In this case the binary package is wrong.
>> >
>> > Why so?
>>
>> I think udev-udevadm is more sound for me.
>
> Ah, you mean the package name?  Yes, udev-udevadm would probably be
> better if we were doing this again from scratch, but renaming an
> existing package is a fairly disruptive thing to do and I don't think
> the existing one is wrong enough to make it worthwhile.

Well, I think it makes sense. What does not make sense to me is to
install udevtest and udevinfo in a system that doesn't use them.

FILES_udev-utils = "${usrbindir}/udevinfo ${sbindir}/udevadm
${usrbindir}/udevtest"

-- 
Otavio Salvador                  O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854         http://projetos.ossystems.com.br