[oe] Kernel recipes with broken PRs now

[Tom Rini]

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:13:01PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 30-05-09 21:16, Tom Rini wrote:
>> while this is a useful mechanism for machines that need
>> it, it's also a PITA for machines that don't
>
> Every machine needs it, since every machine can have external modules  
> (or kernel dependant userspace apps). So stating that "some machines"  
> need it is plain wrong.

Every machine might be able to make use of it, if it either depends on
unstable / in development programs or modules, OR it can use some
external kernel module (IMHO the right answer for this is versioned
dependancies, having the PR be increasing from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 is
different than normal behavior).  This isn't always going to be an
option.

-- 
Tom Rini