[oe] xterm: either fix it, or remove it. please.

[Graeme Gregory]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:59:41PM -0500, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 11/12/2009 04:42 PM, GNUtoo wrote:
> >>Is it practical?  I think the answer is no.  In my experience, tools
> >>like selinux have a tendency to require inordinate amounts of
> >>administrative burden that just isn't practical in a development
> >>environment.  I think requiring that selinux be disabled on build
> >>hosts
> >>is a reasonable requirement, and will avoid wasting a lot of cycles
> >>that
> >>should be spent on OE, and not on administration (or sending lots of
> >>emails).
> >What about supporting only the unconfined user selinux
> >type(unconfined_u),in targeted mode?
> 
> I'm running default Selinux on F11, I don't think we can just say OE
> must have SELinux turned off.
> 
And the SELinux problem doesnt seem to trip up my SELinux F11.

Graeme