[oe] xterm: either fix it, or remove it. please.

[Philip Balister]

On 11/12/2009 04:42 PM, GNUtoo wrote:
>> Is it practical?  I think the answer is no.  In my experience, tools
>> like selinux have a tendency to require inordinate amounts of
>> administrative burden that just isn't practical in a development
>> environment.  I think requiring that selinux be disabled on build
>> hosts
>> is a reasonable requirement, and will avoid wasting a lot of cycles
>> that
>> should be spent on OE, and not on administration (or sending lots of
>> emails).
> What about supporting only the unconfined user selinux
> type(unconfined_u),in targeted mode?

I'm running default Selinux on F11, I don't think we can just say OE 
must have SELinux turned off.

Philip


> Denis.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>