[oe] xterm: either fix it, or remove it. please.

[GNUtoo]

> Is it practical?  I think the answer is no.  In my experience, tools
> like selinux have a tendency to require inordinate amounts of
> administrative burden that just isn't practical in a development
> environment.  I think requiring that selinux be disabled on build
> hosts
> is a reasonable requirement, and will avoid wasting a lot of cycles
> that
> should be spent on OE, and not on administration (or sending lots of
> emails).
What about supporting only the unconfined user selinux
type(unconfined_u),in targeted mode?
Denis.