[oe] Revert "package bbclass: strip static libs as well"

[Holger Hans Peter Freyther]

On Friday 23 October 2009 13:07:06 Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
> > On 23-10-09 11:33, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> > > The last bit is that I would like to put /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a into
> > > the libc-dev package
> >
> > Glibc has its own custom packaging, which we'll probably need to tweaks
> > as well.
> 
> I think that the logic should be:
> 
> libfoo.a exists and libfoo.so exists => put .a to -static.
> 
> libfoo.a exists and libfoo.so does not exist => put .a to -dev.
> 
> This logic will work as most users expect and will need no exception for
> glibc.

This will add even more python code to package.bbclass and can not be realized 
with a FILES_* change. I would prefer a stupid QA check for that as I don't 
expect this to happen on many packages.


z.