[oe] gtk+-native-2.20.0-r8.0 fails in do_configure.

Koen Kooi k.kooi at student.utwente.nl
Thu Apr 8 09:54:37 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08-04-10 11:22, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:58:37 +0200
> Antonio Ospite <ospite at studenti.unina.it> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 20:17:09 +0200
>> Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin at juszkiewicz.com.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> Dnia sobota, 3 kwietnia 2010 o 17:17:24 Antonio Ospite napisał(a):
>>>> when building gtk+-native-2.20.0-r8.0 (actually bitbaking
>>>> fso-console-image DISTRO=minimal MACHINE=a780) I get this message:
>>>>
>>>>  Requested 'glib-2.0 >= 2.23.6' but version of GLib is 2.22.1
>>>>
>>>> See also http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/packages/540390/
>>>>
>>>> I can workaround that locally but I would like to learn what the best
>>>> way to solve such issues would be. I don't see any
>>>> preferred-minimal-versions.inc
>>>
>>> Recent glib-2.0 recipes has BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" set but we also have 
>>> glib-2.0-native recipes... I think that native ones should be dropped.
>>>
>>
>> So what is happening to me now it that glib-2.0-native_2.22.1.bb gets
>> selected and the more recent ones with BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" are
>> discarded, right?
>>
> 
> Ok, I confirm this was actually the case, the old way to do native
> recipes seems to have precedence on the new one, this is with bitbake
> 1.8.18, don't know if that is dependent on bitbake version tho.
> 
> Removing all glib-2.0-native packages makes gtk+-native-2.20.0-r8.0
> build ok.
> 
>> If the -native recipes are going to be dropped should the
>> BBCLASSEXTEND mechanism moved to some glib*.inc file?
>>
> 
> Should I just send a patch which blindly removes native
> recipes for older versions, or try to port the BBCLASSEXTEND mechanism
> to them? I don't know if I am fully comfortable with such changes in OE,
> but I can always send a tentative patch.

Porting them has a slight preference over deleting them. The -native
recipes shouldn't be needed for things like maemo-compat, hence the
'slight' :)

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLvafcMkyGM64RGpERAroAAKCW7+h5AKr8VHhjoowsODwbKdX/+wCglfaW
vf+ofTWZVrCCpZzw6mNyL/8=
=BaGg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list