[oe] What to do about the poor bitbake Quality Control?

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/8/14 Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com>:

>
> If you are using dev head, you're living on the edge. If you can't
> stand that better use the stable branch.
>
> As far as there are issues:
> Either report them, or better fix them.
> (or as a workaround you could find the commit wthat broke it and
> report that and perhaps temporariy locally revert that commit if you
> cannot fix it).
>
> Having said that:
> I don't really see many issues. Maybe I'm building a different set of
> packages or for a different set of hw or for a different distro.
>
> Frans
>
Addition: I noticed when pressing send that you also mailed to
gumstix-users, so apparently you do have a gumstix.
I haven't so I have never build for it and cannot really help you with
it as I am not planning on buying one (so even though I could build I
cannot test).

What you also can do is enable logging to tinderbox then at least the
info of the faulty builds becomes available for others.

Frans