[oe] [PATCH 2/2] recipes: Update recipes to get 'bitbake world' parse and calculate runqueue successfully.

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

Khem,

Thanks for the good work.
I've gone through the file and saw no problems.
The move of the nonbuilding recipes due to missing dependencies (like
with hildon) has been discussed on irc too).
I have a few small remarks (see below), but nothing blocking an ack so,
Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com>

Btw: next time please split things like this in two:
one patch with the files that are moved and one patch with the files
that are modified.
That makes it easier to review the modified recipes.

> diff --git a/recipes/angstrom/angstrom-bootmanager.bb b/recipes/angstrom/angstrom-bootmanager.bb
> index 6cae115..e5f3478 100644
> --- a/recipes/angstrom/angstrom-bootmanager.bb
> +++ b/recipes/angstrom/angstrom-bootmanager.bb
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  DESCRIPTION = "A graphical Boot Manager for the Ångström Linux Distribution"
>  AUTHOR = "Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <mickey at Vanille.de>"
>  SECTION = "base"
> -DEPENDS = "evas-fb ecore-fb esmart-fb imlib2-fb edje efl++-fb"
> +#DEPENDS = "ecore esmart-fb imlib2-fb edje efl++-fb"
>  #RDEPENDS_${PN} = "libefl++0"
>
>  ALLOW_EMPTY = "1"

I'm not too keen on commenting out things. If it is not needed any
more it should just go.
Something like the lines above only cause confusion.
suggest to remove the # lines or to add a short comment explaining why
they are commented out but not removed.


> diff --git a/recipes/xqt2/xqt2_20060509.bb b/recipes/xqt2/xqt2_20060509.bb
> index 7634d27..4492bc7 100644
> --- a/recipes/xqt2/xqt2_20060509.bb
> +++ b/recipes/xqt2/xqt2_20060509.bb
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  DESCRIPTION = "Xqt2 is an X-Server than runs within the Opie environment"
>  HOMEPAGE = "http://xqt.sourceforge.jp"
> -DEPENDS = "freetype libxi xmu flex-native virtual/libqte2 libqpe-opie"
> +DEPENDS = "freetype libxi libxmu flex-native virtual/libqte2 libqpe-opie"
>  LICENSE = "GPL"
>  SECTION = "opie/applications"
>  APPTYPE = "binary"
> --
> 1.7.1

With recipes like this I always wonder if we should keep them.
Apparently they are not build, otherwise the faulty DEPENDS would have
been detected earlier.
And the fact that it is a recipe from 2006 also indicates it is
probably not important.
Can an opie maintainer say whether it is useful to keep this?

Thanks for the good work!
Frans