[oe] [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 02:42:31PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com> wrote:
> > On 12/22/2010 01:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/22/2010 12:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>
> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> On 22-12-10 12:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen at openembedded.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> conf/sanity.conf | 2 +-
> >>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
> >>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
> >>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
> >>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
> >>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> >>>> # See sanity.bbclass
> >>>> #
> >>>> # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
> >>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
> >>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
> >>>>
> >>>> SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
> >>>> SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
> >>>
> >>> If people are agreeing, can I get some Acked-by lines please?
> >>
> >> I agree with the concept but I want a patch that says 1.10.2 once Chris
> >> releases that hopefully later today.
> >
> > To be clear, this is because 1.10.0 has some bugs that aren't all that hard
> > to hit and 1.10.1 reports itself as 1.10.0.  I strongly suspect we have
> > users that stay on the trailing edge, would get 1.10.0 release and hit
> > issues.
> 
> For 1.10.2
> 
> Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>

Let's wait for 1.10.2, but:

Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org>

-- 
Denys