[oe] [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/12/23 Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org>:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 02:42:31PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com> wrote:
>> > On 12/22/2010 01:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 12/22/2010 12:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >>> Hash: SHA1
>> >>>
>> >>> On 22-12-10 12:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen at openembedded.org>
>> >>>> ---
>> >>>> conf/sanity.conf | 2 +-
>> >>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>> >>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>> >>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>> >>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>> >>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>> >>>> # See sanity.bbclass
>> >>>> #
>> >>>> # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
>> >>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>> >>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>> >>>>
>> >>>> SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>> >>>> SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>> >>>
>> >>> If people are agreeing, can I get some Acked-by lines please?
>> >>
>> >> I agree with the concept but I want a patch that says 1.10.2 once Chris
>> >> releases that hopefully later today.
>> >
>> > To be clear, this is because 1.10.0 has some bugs that aren't all that hard
>> > to hit and 1.10.1 reports itself as 1.10.0.  I strongly suspect we have
>> > users that stay on the trailing edge, would get 1.10.0 release and hit
>> > issues.
>>
>> For 1.10.2
>>
>> Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>
> Let's wait for 1.10.2, but:
>
> Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org>

For 1.10.2
Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com>