[oe] [PATCH] barebox: Add recipe for this new bootloader

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 13:10 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 01:22 +0100, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> > Paul Menzel wrote:
> > >> Setting PR is relatively minor, but lets stay consistent :) 
> > > 
> > > Could someone please change this in the manual please [1].
> > > 
> > > »It is good practice to always define PR in your recipes, even for the
> > > "r0" release, so that when editing the recipe it is clear that the PR
> > > number needs to be updated.«
> > 
> > I think it's safe to say that there are two factions with regard to PR
> > being set to r0.  And as you can see, both have their arguments in
> > favor.  Even though it may sound like it, Koen's position is not the
> > only one.  And I guess, neither one is official.
> 
> Yes, I think that's an accurate summary of the situation.  I think the
> only way we will get a definitive answer would be to have the TSC hand
> down a judgement on the matter.

That would seem sensible if only to lay this matter to rest once and for
all! It would also be good to test the TSC processes...

Cheers,

Richard