[oe] include default PR or not (was: [PATCH] barebox: Add recipe for this new bootloader)

Rolf Leggewie no2spam at nospam.arcornews.de
Mon Jan 18 16:24:10 UTC 2010


Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 13:10 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
[...]
>> only way we will get a definitive answer would be to have the TSC hand
>> down a judgement on the matter.
> 
> That would seem sensible if only to lay this matter to rest once and for
> all! It would also be good to test the TSC processes...

I would think this is too minor for the TSC to bother.  But if you want
to take it on, why should I object?  It does take up bandwidth on this
list from time to time, so much is true.  Personally, I don't think the
best option would be to rule in favor of one or the other faction,
because that's what it would be seen for.  I don't think the TSC can
really win and resolve this issue.

*If* the TSC decides to vote on this, may I propose to have it decide
that people are free to include PR as r0 or not as they see fit,
perpetuating current practice. I think that is about the only sensible
solution we can find here.  If anything were to be made definitive, it
should be that devs - when speaking "officially" or something that could
be perceived as such - ought to make sure to stress this is a matter of
(their) personal preference.

Please don't let the TSC turn into some bureaucratic monster that
regulates everything.  When in doubt, feel free to not rule at all.





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list