[oe] [PATCH 2/2] base.bbclass: don't pre-generate checksums.ini entries any longer

Denys Dmytriyenko denis at denix.org
Mon Jan 25 08:00:24 UTC 2010


On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:24:11AM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2010/1/25 Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>:
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org>
> > OK
> >
> > Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> 
> Do we want to do this at this point? Or say in a week (or two) after
> people got acquainted  to the new format.

Understandable, hence my comment in the summary message:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/29487/focus=29560

The second patch removes the old code to generate missing checksums.ini
entries - can be applied later, once the switch to the new method is
complete and proven.

> Btw: I'm not really a script kiddie, but I guess it should not be too
> difficult to cook up a script to update the recipes so we can abandon
> checksums.ini
> (two mechanisms does not seem to be the right way).
> Any takers?

While it's possible to script, the migration path was defined as to only allow 
deletion from the central checksums.ini file, while adding new checksums in 
the corresponding recipes. Still, converting all the entries from the 
checksums.ini at once would have been a fastest approach.

-- 
Denys




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list