[oe] binutils-cross-sdk_cvs.bb fails in do_install

[Antonio Ospite]

On Thu, 20 May 2010 17:25:16 -0700
Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:

> On (21/05/10 00:28), Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > as per subject binutils-cross-sdk_cvs.bb fails to build for
> > DISTRO=minimal this prevents meta-toolchain to be build from scratch as
> > well.
> > 
> > http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/builds/71564/
> > 
> > Any hints?
> 
> Does it happen with 2.20 as well ?
>

No it doesn't. Building 2.20 is OK, even if there are some minor
glitches:

$ bitbake binutils-cross-sdk-2.20
[...]
NOTE: preferred version 2.20.1 of binutils-cross-sdk not available (for item binutils-cross-sdk-2.20)
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
NOTE: preferred version 2.20.1 of binutils-cross-sdk not available (for item binutils-cross-sdk)
ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide binutils-cross-sdk
 (.../binutils/binutils-cross-sdk_2.20.bb .../binutils/binutils-cross-sdk_cvs.bb).
 This usually means one provides something the other doesn't and should.
NOTE: Preparing runqueue
ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide binutils-cross-sdk
 (.../binutils/binutils-cross-sdk_2.20.bb .../binutils/binutils-cross-sdk_cvs.bb).
 This usually means one provides something the other doesn't and should.

See: http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/builds/71580/

Thanks,
   Antonio

-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20100521/3a21cbd1/attachment-0002.sig>