[oe] BitBake parallel parsing testing

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Tue Nov 23 16:42:12 UTC 2010


On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Robert Foerster <robert at erafx.com> wrote:
> Yea, in testing again, I am getting the same results now with num_cpu or
> 2*num_cpu.  All 4 cores are pegged at 100% either way.
>
> Not sure what causes the hiccup in the number before, must have been
> something else consuming CPU.
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Michael Smith <msmith at cbnco.com> wrote:
>
>> Chris Larson wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for your time, and do let me know what you think, either of the
>>> code, performance in general, or the new progress bar (shows an ETA),
>>> or anything else :)
>>>
>>
FWIW I have been using it full time for past few days
and it has been delivering the results. So I am quite happy with
it. my parsing on a dual core p4 went down from 12min to 5mins


>> On a Xen VM with 3 vcpus, this is just brilliant. I used the default number
>> of parse threads (i.e. 3). The CPUs are pretty much pegged.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list