[oe] [RFD] increased dependency checking
Chris Larson
clarson at kergoth.com
Sat Sep 4 18:11:56 UTC 2010
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM, C Michael Sundius <msundius at sundius.com>wrote:
> I have been using a addition that I made to the stamp policy a while ago.
> I sent it to the OE list and the bitbake list but I don't think that it was
> ever adopted,
> eventhough I *think* that I got one or two positive replies to it:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/29858/
>
> I would love to see this patch added to bitbake so I don't have to keep it
> around
> in my repository.
>
> do any of you have any ferther comments?
>
Hmm, should it always be used, the way the patch does currently, or should
it be more the way the whitelist is done, where it only affects for
fulldeptree? I'm not opposed to this going into bitbake, personally.
--
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list