[oe] [RFD] increased dependency checking

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/9/4 Chris Larson <clarson at kergoth.com>:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM, C Michael Sundius <msundius at sundius.com>wrote:
>
>> I have been using a addition that I made to the stamp policy a while ago.
>> I sent it to the OE list and the bitbake list but I don't think that it was
>> ever adopted,
>> eventhough I *think* that I got one or two positive replies to it:
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/29858/
>>
>> I would love to see this patch added to bitbake so I don't have to keep it
>> around
>> in my repository.
>>
>> do any of you have any ferther comments?
>>
>
> Hmm, should it always be used, the way the patch does currently, or should
> it be more the way the whitelist is done, where it only affects for
> fulldeptree?  I'm not opposed to this going into bitbake, personally.
>
I can't judge on the remarks from Chris on the implementation.
The patch from Michael does look sound to me, but I have never looked
at the whitelist code.
The only thing missing in Michaels patch is some documentation on
these nwe vars.

Frans