[oe] [PATCH] base.bbclass: fix soc-family test

Denys Dmytriyenko denis at denix.org
Fri Sep 10 18:50:04 UTC 2010


On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:16:11AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 09/09/2010 10:06 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks<
>> fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin<chase.maupin at ti.com>
>>> Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko<denys at ti.com>
>>> Acked-by: Koen Kooi<k-kooi at ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen at openembedded.org>
>>>
>>> I would suggest modifying the commit policy disallowing these kind of
>>> things, saying the two Ack's must be from two developers not
>>> affiliated with the same company.
>>>
>>
>> I'd agree with this quite strongly.  I'm generally pretty careful to let
>> others review the changes from my coworkers, to avoid any bias.

Chris,

Not to point any fingers, but mishaps happen and numerous reverts would be a 
living proof of that in the repository... :) Nobody's perfect.

> This would be a good topic for OEDEM.
>
> For the record, I am really happy to see the .com people actively 
> participating in the the OE project. I am also glad that they are pushing 
> stuff into .dev and not keeping it in private repositories. This is a very 
> good thing.

As I just replied to Frans' post in this thread - as a company, we are trying 
to follow review procedures closely and give enough time for feedback on the 
patches. I personally would like to apologize for the misunderstanding and 
promise to do a better job in the future.

As an active OE e.V. member on the other hand, I'm all in favor of this 
modification to the commit policy, as long as there is time limit on review 
period and if there are no strong objections, it can be pushed even if only 
acked by the same company. Let's discuss it further and vote at OEDEM.

-- 
Denys




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list