[oe] [PATCH] dnsmasq: add version 2.55 from upstream

Roman I Khimov khimov at altell.ru
Mon Sep 13 14:28:05 UTC 2010


В сообщении от Понедельник 13 сентября 2010 18:16:36 автор Frans Meulenbroeks 
написал:
> 2010/9/13 Roman I Khimov <khimov at altell.ru>:
> > В сообщении от Понедельник 13 сентября 2010 17:02:59 автор Frans
> > Meulenbroeks
> >
> > написал:
> >> 2010/9/13 Roman I Khimov <khimov at altell.ru>:
> >> > В сообщении от Воскресенье 05 сентября 2010 04:00:14 автор Henry von
> >> > Tresckow
> >> >
> >> > написал:
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Henry von Tresckow <hvontres at gmail.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-dbus_2.55.bb |   13 +++++++++++++
> >> >>  recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.55.bb      |    4 ++++
> >> >>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >> >>  create mode 100644 recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-dbus_2.55.bb
> >> >>  create mode 100644 recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.55.bb
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Roman I Khimov <khimov at altell.ru>
> >>
> >> No problem with this version, but is it useful to keep versions like
> >> 2.52. Please avoid version clutter!
> >
> > At least it doesn't hurt in this case IMO. Although 2.55 works fine here
> > since July (with technically exactly the same patch, somehow I've missed
> > it when was looking for things to push in OE) it has many various changes
> > compared to 2.52, maybe too many for someone.
> 
> Well my main concern is that we have now 6 versions of this recipe,
> and I think hardly anyone has an idea on the differences between
> these.

Probably we can drop versions prior to 2.52 because that have known security 
issues and 2.52 is in the tree for quite some time. 2.52 doesn't hurt at all 
IMO, again.




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list