[oe] [PATCH] dnsmasq: add version 2.55 from upstream

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/9/13 Roman I Khimov <khimov at altell.ru>:
> В сообщении от Понедельник 13 сентября 2010 18:16:36 автор Frans Meulenbroeks
> написал:
>> 2010/9/13 Roman I Khimov <khimov at altell.ru>:
>> > В сообщении от Понедельник 13 сентября 2010 17:02:59 автор Frans
>> > Meulenbroeks
>> >
>> > написал:
>> >> 2010/9/13 Roman I Khimov <khimov at altell.ru>:
>> >> > В сообщении от Воскресенье 05 сентября 2010 04:00:14 автор Henry von
>> >> > Tresckow
>> >> >
>> >> > написал:
>> >> >> Signed-off-by: Henry von Tresckow <hvontres at gmail.com>
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >>  recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-dbus_2.55.bb |   13 +++++++++++++
>> >> >>  recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.55.bb      |    4 ++++
>> >> >>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >> >>  create mode 100644 recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-dbus_2.55.bb
>> >> >>  create mode 100644 recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.55.bb
>> >> >
>> >> > Acked-by: Roman I Khimov <khimov at altell.ru>
>> >>
>> >> No problem with this version, but is it useful to keep versions like
>> >> 2.52. Please avoid version clutter!
>> >
>> > At least it doesn't hurt in this case IMO. Although 2.55 works fine here
>> > since July (with technically exactly the same patch, somehow I've missed
>> > it when was looking for things to push in OE) it has many various changes
>> > compared to 2.52, maybe too many for someone.
>>
>> Well my main concern is that we have now 6 versions of this recipe,
>> and I think hardly anyone has an idea on the differences between
>> these.
>
> Probably we can drop versions prior to 2.52 because that have known security
> issues and 2.52 is in the tree for quite some time. 2.52 doesn't hurt at all
> IMO, again.

Seems an excellent plan to me, can you provide a patch?

Frans