[oe] `PR = "r0"`: Add or not to add?

[Anders Darander]

* Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> [110831 15:01]:
> Op 31-08-11 14:43, Anders Darander schreef:
> > Just curious (and it might convince me and others) what issues have PR = 
> > "r0" caused in .dev?

> The most recent one in .dev was xorg .inc files. Some recipes had PR, some
> didn't, and some had INC_PR. In this specific case there should have been
> only one PR (or INC_PR) in the .inc.

> And of course the good old "add PR=r0 to the .inc, making older recipes go
> backwards" thing.

> In OE-core/meta-oe the most recent annoyance were the gcc recipes, which now
> finally have a centrally managed PR.

> No situation is perfect, but my *personal* experience is that not adding
> PR=r0 is *less* annoying than adding it.

Thanks for the sum up.

At least I have a lot better understanding of your position now. (And
I'll have to ponder a little bit, to see if my opion should change or
not).

Thanks!
Anders

-- 
Anders Darander
ChargeStorm AB