[oe] `PR = "r0"`: Add or not to add?

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 31-08-11 15:02, Otavio Salvador schreef:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:45, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
> wrote:
>>> Please accept PR = "r0" on new recipes since it makes it more
>>> consistent and easy to new users.
>> 
>> Consistent in what way? If you want to be consistent you need to add
>> *all* variables to the recipe and set it to their default.
> 
> Not really; consistency has nothing to do with verboseness. PR is 
> something we will need to change ofthen so makes sense to be in recipes.
> 
> Besides, this is also on the policy

The OE classic policy maybe, not on the meta-oe policy[1].

> so or you change the policy or you follow it. Otherwise makes no sense to
> have a policy if the person who merge the patches do not follow it.

- From http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Category:Policy I read:

http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy
http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_log_example
http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Styleguide
http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Versioning_Policy

And none of those say PR = r0 is wanted behaviour. OTOH it doesn't say it's
unwanted either.

regards,

Koen

[1] There is no such thing yet, what I'm doing now is following the OE-core
policies where it makes sense. If someone wants to make a draft policy for
the meta-oe layers, please do so.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFOXjdyMkyGM64RGpERAoitAJ98GgMcmfgZqg0va9wQ7zMksseSsgCfS76f
f3oPFRWC3aD+EuB6AO+C1QQ=
=ahhZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----