[oe] libnl vs. libnl2 madness

Koen Kooi k.kooi at student.utwente.nl
Fri Feb 11 10:15:32 UTC 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03-02-11 11:12, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:54:08AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> On Thursday 03 February 2011 10:32:53 Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> The last hours I was trying to compile wpa_supplicant with nl80211 support.
>>> That needs netlink support through libnl or libnl2.
>>>
>>> Enabling the option to use libnl2, not that easy to find, still breaks with
>>> missing header files. Checking the libnl2 source shows that they are
>>> provided. After some head on the table banging I found:
>>>
>>> commit 880e00d3b7ccf66d9421a06bc28e553e07842b59
>>> Author: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <mickey at vanille-media.de>
>>> Date:   Tue Nov 24 16:33:06 2009 +0000
>>>
>>>     libnl2: change includedir to not step over libnl1; also convert to new
>>> staging
>>
>> At that time there was just one recipe depending on libnl2 and that was FSO2.
>> I think one month ago JaMa has build the first SHR image without libnl(1), 
> 
> yes after couple of changes
> http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/log/?h=org.openembedded.dev&qt=grep&q=libnl
> 
>> until then it was impossible because of some important parts. I'm not sure but 
>> i think the main blocker was bluez4 (Can't check now).
> 
> Yes older bluez4 with nl plugin (which was removed later).
> 
> and:
> http://gitorious.org/~jama/angstrom/jama-shr-experimental/commit/70b13d30b335b8fd67116d3bc0834382a77bc319

> 85	ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-iw = "iw depends on libnl we want libnl2"

That one was fixed

> 90	ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-rfkill = "rfkill depends on libnl we want libnl2"

That one was fixed as well

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNVQxEMkyGM64RGpERAtyqAJ9RH01ASiC4/BebDfkW4Vj/BdQiHACePQBQ
chy6qKs4vwoz7joQk0u/x9E=
=H06U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list