[oe] TSC agenda items for the next meeting

Frans Meulenbroeks fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com
Mon Feb 14 06:58:37 UTC 2011


2011/2/13 Koen Kooi <k.kooi at student.utwente.nl>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> The new TSC is holding a meeting next week and we wanted to see if
> anyone wants to suggest items we put in the agenda for the meeting.
>
> If you have such items, please let us know by replying to this mail.
>

- come to a set of minimal quality requirements for our recipes/packages
(e.g. must fetch, minimal required headers etc).
My proposal would be to use the yocto requirements as a starter

- splitting our metadata into multiple layers
I can think of the following:
- oe core layer (shared with yocto
- oe layer (or oe extra's or whatever you want to call it; containing
recipes that are generic, not in oe-core and considered to be of
common use)
- maybe oe-old or so layer (recipes that are not maintained any more)
- layer per distro for distro specific stuff
- layer per machine (or maybe soc family, I can imagine it makes sense
to keep BB and BB-XM together; similarly for the kirkwoord variants)
- vendor specific layers (if needed), e.g. ti (although maybe that
stuff could also go into a machine layer)
Rationale is that users can pull in only those layers that they need.

- consider a version based release mechanism
yocto has a release model, intermediate versions are aiming to build
but are considered to be less mature.
If our core recipes follow this model, I can imagine it is a good
strategy to follow in oe too.

Frans




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list