[oe] [PATCH 1/3] libomxil-bellagio: cosmetics: unify recipes

Paul Menzel paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net
Mon Jan 17 11:48:11 UTC 2011


Am Montag, den 17.01.2011, 09:14 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> On 17-01-11 00:32, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:34:08 +0100
> > 
> > Just reorder the lines to be consistent throughout all recipes and to adhere to the style guide [1].
> > 
> > [1] http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Styleguide
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net>
> > ---
> >  recipes/openmax/libomxil-bellagio_0.9.0.bb |    6 ++----
> >  recipes/openmax/libomxil-bellagio_0.9.1.bb |   10 ++++------
> 
> 
> FWIW, the above two aren't used and can get deleted, I suspect they
> don't even build against our recent ffmpeg

Is it alright to send a follow-up patch after this patch series has been
committed?

> >  recipes/openmax/libomxil-bellagio_0.9.2.bb |   10 ++++------

Just for my interest, what is the reason to use 0.9.2 instead of
0.9.2.1?

[…]


Thanks,

Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20110117/04f2c41b/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list