[oe] [PATCH 1/3] libomxil-bellagio: cosmetics: unify recipes

Koen Kooi k.kooi at student.utwente.nl
Mon Jan 17 13:08:16 UTC 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 17-01-11 12:48, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Montag, den 17.01.2011, 09:14 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi:
>> On 17-01-11 00:32, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>> Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:34:08 +0100
>>>
>>> Just reorder the lines to be consistent throughout all recipes and to adhere to the style guide [1].
>>>
>>> [1] http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Styleguide
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net>
>>> ---
>>>  recipes/openmax/libomxil-bellagio_0.9.0.bb |    6 ++----
>>>  recipes/openmax/libomxil-bellagio_0.9.1.bb |   10 ++++------
>>
>>
>> FWIW, the above two aren't used and can get deleted, I suspect they
>> don't even build against our recent ffmpeg
> 
> Is it alright to send a f
ollow-up patch after this patch series has been
> committed?

surr

> 
>>>  recipes/openmax/libomxil-bellagio_0.9.2.bb |   10 ++++------
> 
> Just for my interest, what is the reason to use 0.9.2 instead of
> 0.9.2.1?

none, I just misread :) 0.9.2 can go as well.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNND8/MkyGM64RGpERApd6AJ9DR9W5xf8JmOFojgIRHoMijdZNCgCcDRRa
9NuIBOL4QaBwqn3jhGQV5xM=
=AXCH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list