[oe] systemd packages -> image

[Anders Darander]

* Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> [111110 11:21]:
> Op 10-11-11 10:47, Paul Eggleton schreef:
> > On Thursday 10 November 2011 08:47:17 Anders Darander wrote:
> >> * Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony at gmx.de> [111109 23:17]:
> >>> Imagine a recipe is included into an image by a task and later gets 
> >>> systemd- native support. How about forcing the packages in
> >>> SYSTEMD_PACKAGES packed into images in case

> >>> IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER  = "systemd"

> >>> is found in the image definition?

> >> Sure, that sounds like a nice idea. Although, in that case, SysV-init 
> >> files should probably also be packaged in separate packages and be 
> >> installed in a similar manner.

> > Why are we going to such an effort to provide both sysvinit and systemd
> > in the same distro? Why not make it a distro policy decision? This would
> > save a huge amount of work.

> So I can start sending patches to add the systemd files to ${PN} in oe-core
> recipes now? That's the big hold up: lack of vision from the OE-core folks.

Why not, it'd be nice to not have to install a bunch of extra packages
just to get the systemd files installed. (OTOH, no big deal, but then we
also could consider splitting out the SysV-init-files...)

And we should also move systemd into oe-core. That's atleast my wish... 

/Anders

-- 
Anders Darander
ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB