[oe] [2011.03-maintenance] Pull request for binutils

[Mats Kärrman]

Tom,
I'm sorry for the slow progress but I'm working 100% on something else so this is overtime...
What is the correct practice; to fork the oe repository at GitHub or to create a "username/maintenance" branch in the same repo?
BR // Mats
________________________________________
From: openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org [openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] on behalf of Tom Rini [tom.rini at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:43 AM
To: openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [oe] [2011.03-maintenance] Pull request for binutils

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Oct 21, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Mats Kärrman wrote:

> Hello Tom,
>
> Please pull this commit from here:
>
> URI: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded
> Branch: org.openembedded.dev (master)
>
> Paul Menzel (1):
>      binutils-{canadian,cross}-sdk_2.18: Remove checksums and implicitly update them

Sorry if it wasn't clear on the wiki page but what I'm asking for is a git branch you've created somewhere (github, gitorious, whatever, is fine) and tested that you've got all of the changes you need cherry-picked in or otherwise applied.  Thanks!

- --
Tom

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAk6mIkMACgkQdZngf2G4WwNWIwCfdDRM8w8ouqgCV4h7az5a797N
dxQAnjsK4/yvXOsbAxUJoCW95GdBQaqk
=SxUa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel