[oe] How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic?

Koen Kooi koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Thu Sep 15 10:42:41 UTC 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 15-09-11 12:20, Paul Eggleton schreef:
> On Thursday 15 September 2011 11:07:48 Paul Menzel wrote:
>> it is confusing for outsiders if oe.dev and OE classic are referring
>> to the same repository or not.
> 
> I can see how people could be confused, so yes we probably ought to have
> just one name.
> 
>> So we need to make up an official name for the old repository. oe.dev
>> or OE classic? I favor oe.dev, because it is shorter
> 
> oe-dev/oe.dev being a shortened "org.openembedded.dev" is kind of a relic
> of the old (was it bitkeeper or monotone?) days prior to git. The benefit
> of "classic" is it draws attention to the fact that it's deprecated,
> whereas to me, dev implies that's where development still occurs. So my
> personal vote is for OE-classic.

OEbsolete :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFOcdahMkyGM64RGpERAhgHAJ9WvlhqWWAmVJQlvUeqC4Ue6orxrACfSh09
gpzdp5Vipbbg5Znf6fca4MQ=
=31CR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list