[oe] [meta-oe][RFC 01/27] systemd.bbclass: rework

[Andreas Müller]

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Andreas Müller
<schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> wrote:
Apart from the NAKed distro setting and automatic DEPENDS - are there
comments on the other:

let systemd.bbclass do more for us
>
> * handle multiple entries in SYSTEMD_SERVICE. Currenly there are no use cases
>  but networkmanager has potential requirements
> * handle multiple entries in SYSTEMD_PACKAGES. Possible use cases are
>  dhcp/dhcp-relay and ntp/ntpdate
> * enhance the checks for SYSTEMD_PACKAGES and SYSTEMD_SERVICE. For package
>  names only <name-of-an-existing-package>-systemd or ${PN} are allowed. In
>  case of using ${PN} a warning is spitted. This was introduced to force recipe
>  maintainers to separate out systemd to own package.
> * all systemd packages are automatically created based on SYSTEMD_PACKAGES
* for systemd packets  automatically add RDEPENDS to base packages
> * all *.socket and *.service files included by SRC_URI are automatically
>  installed from WORKDIR.
would it make sense to split this up and resend?

Andreas