[oe] oe-core layer including support for i.MX28
Alex J Lennon
ajlennon at dynamicdevices.co.uk
Thu Mar 15 17:26:42 UTC 2012
>That said, I do believe you ought to check if your changes cannot be made generic
Will try to keep in mind.
>Please complain at them ... this is the only way to revert it.
I'll keep on at them :) Anything not to have to go back to LTIB... ;)
Alex
On 15/03/2012 17:21, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 14:16, Alex J Lennon
> <ajlennon at dynamicdevices.co.uk> wrote:
>>> I think the first solution is better and that custom boards should be added
>>> to custom layers
>> Hmmm ok, thanks That being the case it may be better for me to migrate my
>> recipes from
>> the oe-classic codebase into a new layer created from scratch. It'll be
>> quicker and easier for
>> me that way but perhaps less generic.
> I think many things can be merged back but it is better to have custom
> boards in specific layers that inherit meta-fsl-arm. That said, I do
> believe you ought to check if your changes cannot be made generic
> (ofthenly it can be done) and this could allow it to be merged here.
>
>> (Although my understanding was that Freescale have no intention of providing
>> Linux support related
>> to OpenEmbedded at this time? Or at least that's what they are telling me
>> :)
> Please complain at them ... this is the only way to revert it. Some
> individuals are working with OpenEmbedded/Yocto and it might end
> changing the Freescale's position if we can enough community support
> and complains at them :-)
>
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list