[oe] [RFC][meta-oe][meta-toolchain][PATCH] meta-toolchain: populate with gcc and binutils from meta-oe

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 22-03-12 11:15, Koen Kooi schreef:
> 
> Op 22 mrt. 2012, om 11:07 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:01:39AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
>> 
>> Why not move them?
> 
> This was done to have people test it in the oe-core + meta-toolchain
> setup. And to avoid bblayers.conf conflicts
> 
>> Or create stub of meta-toolchain in 1st patch for people to add it to 
>> bblayers and then move it in 2nd.
> 
> That sounds like a better way to do it. Maybe Eric will do that in his
> patchset :)

I don't have a strong opinion on this and if Eric wants me to respin the RFC
I'll gladly do that. But I would prefer that I can be lazy and just merge
other peoples patches :)

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=5mMh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----