[oe] [RFC][meta-oe][meta-toolchain][PATCH] meta-toolchain: populate with gcc and binutils from meta-oe

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Thu Mar 22 12:23:20 UTC 2012


On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 22-03-12 11:15, Koen Kooi schreef:
>>
>> Op 22 mrt. 2012, om 11:07 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:01:39AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
>>>
>>> Why not move them?
>>
>> This was done to have people test it in the oe-core + meta-toolchain
>> setup. And to avoid bblayers.conf conflicts
>>
>>> Or create stub of meta-toolchain in 1st patch for people to add it to
>>> bblayers and then move it in 2nd.
>>
>> That sounds like a better way to do it. Maybe Eric will do that in his
>> patchset :)
>
> I don't have a strong opinion on this and if Eric wants me to respin the RFC
> I'll gladly do that. But I would prefer that I can be lazy and just merge
> other peoples patches :)

yes git move should be better since then we can do git log --follow I
dont know if that works with copied files too or not.

meta-toolchain may not be the best name since we already have
meta-toolchain as a target for sdk generation. that should actually
have been called sdk but here we will create a confusion. but may be
target in OE-Core should ve renamed too

>
> regards,
>
> Koen
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPav6tAAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6zcYP/2CHId7lbxYDDC2sMa8fb7Nt
> +FIRDOIDyF+laMlAwuMMuN0NN6228mxnxmCD0tkrcq6wJnaBJ5+LKkHmwYAUnjrY
> q4ayrZTWGGTIkcYVpeizZCh15AomFLuBzTKP/XdOUESQscheV/zdWgT26hqVRQrS
> 3spk1oS2kzevvmmSqjxBxUUmFMGi85ZcjcsN0aIUpf11+dkU1SpIrGIr7BnybGr/
> FEXzWFCHRtSsmI9J6n6dhrDrm3d2fMxV+9AbqeE1SQbaGV+lA+vag5aDhYdfpbOF
> S+aPYCCm0rrDsFvNqYTq/IU5Fx2/WUa6zHZlnWoUd1iyvPOaiRezGS7diQfV0R3v
> OxCy/75j2cq2ofPebJWG5zGhDvDk9TWW6BqC791WAm9VJjD4ztFhvtE12nXYqIoC
> 9TDAoURNPNX4FBnLQkX0p6Luo4P5c9hgo6BBwQZR2fwmov4R1nq91AFsMrKJRyxh
> VCAqSbzaTJq1zJhh5UZNwRB0SyvDgLbi58NFVOGItX/DUUCUbjC+/aXyIV4Czf75
> OeQ29f8vPvzed9wryg8rdogccbuJ2QY9MGaBfEkUOwBNt/HzhYFY4WpcGvvpqsqA
> VzPe0wst0+ncGdB2/MewNETXPGy3Mp8xvUTvlabaXnOzRmZqUxkqONVnSZkQqGOy
> BCepRNuESem5ktLHCKQS
> =5mMh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list