[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH ] libhugetlbfs: add recipe

Luo Zhenhua-B19537 B19537 at freescale.com
Wed Aug 28 12:32:33 UTC 2013


Sure, I can do it. 


Best Regards,

Zhenhua

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Fathi Boudra
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:39 PM
> To: openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH ] libhugetlbfs: add recipe
> 
> On 28 August 2013 08:21, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 <B19537 at freescale.com> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> >> [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
> >> Of Fathi Boudra
> >>
> >> On 28 August 2013 05:56, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 <B19537 at freescale.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > libhugetlbfs should be moved to a common layer, since it can be
> >> > used by
> >> other BSPs
> >>
> >> agreed.
> >>
> >> > except linaro.
> >>
> >> what do you mean by "except Linaro"?
> > [Luo Zhenhua-B19537] I mean libhugetlbfs recipe is maintained in meta-
> linaro layer.
> 
> It make sense to get rid of if in meta-linaro and move libhugetlbfs in a
> common layer where it can be used by everybody.
> Now the question is who's doing this work? I suggested that you'll do it
> since you've submitted libhugetlbfs inclusion.
> However, if you don't want to do it, fair enough, I'll take a look to
> make it generic and will propose patches.
> 
> Thought?
> 
> Cheers,
> Fathi
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list