[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH ] libhugetlbfs: add recipe

[Fathi Boudra]

On 28 August 2013 15:32, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 <B19537 at freescale.com> wrote:
> Sure, I can do it.

awesome! thanks.

> Best Regards,
>
> Zhenhua
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
>> [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
>> Fathi Boudra
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:39 PM
>> To: openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>> Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH ] libhugetlbfs: add recipe
>>
>> On 28 August 2013 08:21, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 <B19537 at freescale.com> wrote:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
>> >> [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
>> >> Of Fathi Boudra
>> >>
>> >> On 28 August 2013 05:56, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 <B19537 at freescale.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > libhugetlbfs should be moved to a common layer, since it can be
>> >> > used by
>> >> other BSPs
>> >>
>> >> agreed.
>> >>
>> >> > except linaro.
>> >>
>> >> what do you mean by "except Linaro"?
>> > [Luo Zhenhua-B19537] I mean libhugetlbfs recipe is maintained in meta-
>> linaro layer.
>>
>> It make sense to get rid of if in meta-linaro and move libhugetlbfs in a
>> common layer where it can be used by everybody.
>> Now the question is who's doing this work? I suggested that you'll do it
>> since you've submitted libhugetlbfs inclusion.
>> However, if you don't want to do it, fair enough, I'll take a look to
>> make it generic and will propose patches.
>>
>> Thought?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Fathi