[oe] [meta-qt5] GStreamer-1.0 path breaking 0.1 support‏

[Martin Jansa]

FWIW: there is also:
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/88555/

also still waiting for v3 and I don't know if it was tested with 0.10
gstreamer.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
wrote:

> > Otherwise, why is the patch that seems to have been accepted in 2014 to
> fix the 1.0 breaking 0.1 support not been implemented in the layer yet?
>
> It's incorrectly marked as Accepted in patchwork, but it was never merged
> into the repository, because the author never sent v2 with review comments
> from me resolved.
>
> There was another patch:
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/85075/
> which was merged and nobody was reporting broken 0.10 support since then.
> I'm not using 0.10 version, so I was assuming it works now for people who
> do.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Gerhard de Clercq <
> gerharddeclercq at outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just wasted a lot of time trying to get qtmultimedia to compile on a
>> Fido build using the Fido branch of meta-qt5. After a lot of tinkering I
>> finally got it working and have found that the problem was caused by the
>> 0001-Initial-porting-effort-to-GStreamer-1.0.patch file that ships with the
>> layer. I initially didn't realize that the troublesome code was coming from
>> it and debugged the cached source (which it seems is patched) until it
>> worked. I didn't think it would be so easy but a patch
>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/79531/ I found from 2014
>> completely told me how to correct the source.
>>
>> What bothers me is how can this can be possible. Are the recipes designed
>> not to apply the patch to non 1.0 build and if so, what could prevent that
>> from working? Otherwise, why is the patch that seems to have been accepted
>> in 2014 to fix the 1.0 breaking 0.1 support not been implemented in the
>> layer yet?
>>
>> PS. I see the patch file has changed a bit after Fido but unfortunately
>> Fido is the latest that my board supports at the moment and I have not been
>> able to test with a newer version.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gerhard de Clercq
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
>
>